Lesson Plans for the U.S. Civil War: The Election of 1860 and the Secession Winter
The Great Debate: Lincoln vs. Douglas
August 21, 1858 – Ottawa, Illinois
Nathaniel Reed had never seen such a crowd in his life. He stood on the edge of the town square, his feet firmly planted in the dry summer dust, as men, women, and even children pressed closer to the wooden platform at the center. The noise of the gathering—excited chatter, the shuffling of boots, and the calls of vendors selling lemonade and newspapers—was electric with anticipation. Today, two of the most famous men in the country were about to debate.
Nathaniel gripped the newspaper in his hands, rereading the bold headline: “LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS TO DEBATE! SLAVERY AND UNION AT STAKE!” The very idea sent a shiver down his spine. He had come to see for himself whether Abraham Lincoln or Stephen Douglas had the answers that would decide the fate of the nation.
As the sun beat down, the crowd suddenly hushed. A short, stout man in a finely tailored suit climbed onto the platform first. His dark eyes flashed as he raised a hand to silence the remaining murmurs. Stephen A. Douglas, the famed “Little Giant,” was here. He removed his hat and cleared his throat.
Douglas: "The Right of the People to Choose!"
“My fellow citizens,” Douglas began, his voice steady and sure, “we are here to discuss the great question of our time—whether this government can continue to exist divided into free and slave states.”
Murmurs of approval ran through the crowd.
“I stand for popular sovereignty,” Douglas continued. “Let the people of each state and territory decide for themselves whether to allow slavery! The federal government has no right to force its will upon us. The people, my friends, are the rightful rulers of this nation, not a president, not a congress, and certainly not Mr. Lincoln!”
Laughter and applause erupted from the crowd. Nathaniel watched closely, his heart pounding. He knew Lincoln had a very different view, and he was eager to hear the counterargument.
Douglas pointed toward Lincoln, who sat patiently on a chair near the platform. “This man—this Abolitionist in disguise—would have you believe that our Union cannot last unless it is all free or all slave. But let me ask you this: Will you let one man and his radical party tear apart the compromise that has held this great nation together?”
Cheers erupted, but Nathaniel wasn’t convinced. He had heard enough about popular sovereignty to know that it had led to Bleeding Kansas, where pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers had fought in the streets over the right to choose. Was Douglas’s plan really keeping the nation together, or was it pushing it closer to war?
Lincoln: "A House Divided Cannot Stand"
Abraham Lincoln finally stood, his tall, lanky frame towering over Douglas. He adjusted his coat and stepped forward, his eyes scanning the sea of faces before him. Nathaniel felt a strange hush fall over the crowd.
Lincoln took a deep breath.
“Senator Douglas says this government was made on the principle that the white man may enslave the black man if he so chooses.”
A gasp rippled through the crowd. Nathaniel saw Douglas smirk, but Lincoln pressed on.
“I deny it. This nation was founded on the principle that all men are created equal!” Lincoln’s voice rang out, and cheers rose from his supporters.
Nathaniel grinned. He had heard Lincoln’s “House Divided” speech in Springfield earlier that year, and he knew that phrase was coming soon.
“This government,” Lincoln continued, “cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.”
A murmur of debate filled the crowd. Some men nodded in agreement, others scoffed.
Lincoln turned toward Douglas now, his eyes sharp. “The Kansas-Nebraska Act was supposed to settle this issue, but instead, it has brought war to our very doorsteps. Men have killed each other in the streets over the question of slavery. And yet Senator Douglas would have you believe that we can simply ‘let the people decide.’”
He paused, letting the weight of his words settle. “Senator Douglas is wrong. The nation must take a stand.”
Nathaniel felt his chest tighten. Lincoln had a way of making the issue seem so clear, so urgent. He glanced at the faces in the crowd. Some men seemed convinced, others shook their heads. The battle of ideas was playing out before their very eyes.
Douglas Strikes Back
Douglas wasted no time. He leaped to his feet and pointed a finger at Lincoln.
“My opponent would have you believe that he alone knows what is best for this country,” he thundered. “Yet just a few years ago, he said he was not an abolitionist. And now, he speaks as if slavery must end altogether! Tell me, Mr. Lincoln—do you believe in racial equality? Do you think the black man should be your equal in society?”
Gasps and murmurs rippled through the crowd. Nathaniel watched as Lincoln’s expression darkened.
“I am not saying that I wish to make blacks and whites politically or socially equal,” Lincoln said carefully. “But what I do say is that a black man, just like a white man, is entitled to the fruits of his labor. If slavery is not wrong, then nothing is wrong.”
His voice was steady, but Nathaniel could feel the tension in the air. He knew that even some in the North did not believe in full equality. But Lincoln was drawing a moral line, and Nathaniel respected that.
The Debate Ends, But the Fight Continues
After nearly three hours, the debate came to a close. Douglas had attacked Lincoln as a radical, someone who would tear the Union apart with his anti-slavery stance. Lincoln, in turn, had painted Douglas as a man of compromise, someone who allowed slavery to spread through inaction.
As the candidates shook hands and stepped off the platform, the crowd erupted into a mix of cheers, boos, and heated discussions. Nathaniel turned to the man next to him, an older gentleman who had been nodding at Lincoln’s words.
“What do you think?” Nathaniel asked.
The man scratched his beard thoughtfully. “I think Lincoln speaks to the heart of the matter. This country can’t stay divided forever. But Douglas—he speaks to what’s practical.”
Nathaniel nodded slowly. That was the heart of the debate. Principle vs. practicality. The future of the Union depended on which vision the people chose.
As the sun set, Nathaniel walked home, his mind racing. One thing was certain—this would not be the last time he would hear these men debate. And as the years went on, he knew the fate of the country hung on how the people answered one burning question: Would America remain divided, or would it take a stand?
Author’s Note: This story captures the essence of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, particularly their discussion on slavery, popular sovereignty, and the fate of the Union. The actual Ottawa debate on August 21, 1858, and the later Freeport debate, where Douglas introduced the famous Freeport Doctrine, shaped national politics leading up to Lincoln’s presidential victory in 1860.
The Election of 1860: A Nation Divided
The Election of 1860 was one of the most contentious and significant in American history, setting the stage for the Civil War and the dissolution of the Union. It was not merely a contest between political candidates—it was a clash of ideologies, with the future of slavery and the Union itself at stake. Unlike previous elections, this one featured a four-way race, deep regional divisions, and an unprecedented level of tension that ultimately led to secession and war.
A Nation on the Brink of Division
By 1860, the United States was in crisis. The issue of slavery’s expansion into new territories had dominated national politics for decades, with increasingly violent consequences. The Missouri Compromise (1820) and the Compromise of 1850 had attempted to ease tensions, but events such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision (1857) inflamed both Northern and Southern sentiments.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act effectively nullified the Missouri Compromise by allowing territories to vote on whether to permit slavery, leading to a bloody conflict known as "Bleeding Kansas." Meanwhile, the Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford that African Americans were not citizens and that Congress had no power to restrict slavery in the territories. These developments convinced many Northerners that the South was attempting to spread slavery nationwide, while Southerners feared growing Northern opposition to their way of life.
The nation had reached a boiling point, and the presidential election of 1860 would determine whether compromise was still possible—or if the Union was doomed to fracture.
A Four-Way Battle for the Presidency
Unlike previous elections, which had typically featured two main parties, the election of 1860 was a four-way contest, reflecting the deep divisions within the country. The Democratic Party split into two factions, the newly formed Republican Party emerged as a strong contender, and a fourth party attempted to hold the Union together.
Abraham Lincoln (Republican Party) – Representing the newly dominant Republican Party, Lincoln was a moderate on slavery but strongly opposed its expansion into new territories. He had gained national attention during his famous debates with Stephen Douglas and was seen as the North’s best hope to stop the spread of slavery. However, he was not even on the ballot in 10 Southern states, illustrating the deep sectional divide.
Stephen Douglas (Northern Democratic Party) – The official Democratic nominee, Douglas tried to appeal to both North and South. He promoted popular sovereignty, the idea that states and territories should decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. However, this position alienated many Southern Democrats, who wanted stronger guarantees for slavery’s expansion.
John C. Breckinridge (Southern Democratic Party) – The sitting Vice President of the United States, Breckinridge was nominated by the Southern Democrats, who had broken away from Douglas’s faction. He was the pro-slavery candidate, advocating for the protection and expansion of slavery into the western territories. He was extremely popular in the Deep South but had little support in the North.
John Bell (Constitutional Union Party) – Seeking to avoid the issue of slavery altogether, Bell and his Constitutional Union Party promoted preserving the Union and enforcing the Constitution. His supporters, mainly in border states like Kentucky and Tennessee, hoped to prevent war by avoiding the contentious slavery debate.
With four candidates, the election became a chaotic struggle, with different regions of the country backing different men.
Each Candidate’s Stances
Abraham Lincoln (Republican) – Opposed Expansion of Slavery but Not Abolition
Abraham Lincoln, the Republican Party nominee, stood firmly against the expansion of slavery into new territories, but he did not advocate for the immediate abolition of slavery where it already existed. This position was designed to unify a diverse Republican coalition that included abolitionists, former Whigs, and Free Soil supporters who opposed the spread of slavery but were not necessarily calling for its eradication.
Lincoln’s most famous argument was that the United States could not remain "a house divided"—it could not endure as a nation half free and half enslaved. However, Lincoln assured Southern states that he had no plans to interfere with slavery in the South. Instead, his platform focused on preventing its expansion, believing that if slavery were contained, it would eventually die out on its own.
His election was seen as a direct threat to Southern interests, as many in the South feared that restricting slavery’s expansion was the first step toward total abolition. Because of this, Lincoln’s name was not even on the ballot in 10 Southern states, showing just how deeply divided the nation was at the time of the election.
Stephen Douglas (Northern Democrat) – Supported Popular Sovereignty
Stephen A. Douglas, the candidate of the Northern Democratic Party, was a long-time senator from Illinois and one of the most well-known politicians of the era. Unlike Lincoln, Douglas did not take a moral stance on slavery itself but instead advocated for "popular sovereignty"—the belief that each state and territory should decide for itself whether to allow slavery.
Douglas’s position was an attempt to balance Northern and Southern interests, giving territories the power to choose without direct federal interference. He had championed this idea through the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed settlers to vote on slavery’s legality within their borders. However, this policy had led to extreme violence in Kansas, as pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions clashed in a mini civil war known as "Bleeding Kansas."
Douglas's campaign focused on preserving the Union through compromise. However, his efforts to walk the fine line between pro- and anti-slavery factions alienated many voters. Southerners did not trust him because he refused to support federal protection of slavery, while Northerners saw him as too willing to compromise with slaveholders.
His strongest support came from Northern Democrats who wanted to maintain the Union without directly confronting the issue of slavery. Despite his influence, the split within the Democratic Party ultimately weakened his chances of winning.
John C. Breckinridge (Southern Democrat) – Pro-Slavery Expansion
John C. Breckinridge, the sitting Vice President of the United States, became the nominee of the Southern Democratic Party after the Democrats split over the issue of slavery. Unlike Douglas, who advocated for popular sovereignty, Breckinridge was the candidate of the pro-slavery South, believing that slavery should not only be allowed to expand into new territories but also be explicitly protected by federal law.
Breckinridge and his supporters viewed Lincoln’s election as a direct threat to their way of life, fearing that any limitation on slavery’s expansion would ultimately lead to its destruction. His platform called for a federal slave code, ensuring that slavery was protected in all U.S. territories, regardless of what settlers there might vote for.
His candidacy was extremely popular in the Deep South, where he won nearly all electoral votes. However, he had little support in the North and border states. Breckinridge’s campaign effectively represented the South’s growing willingness to break away from the Union if Lincoln were elected. His candidacy, more than any other, pushed the South closer to secession as it became clear that they could not win through the ballot box.
John Bell (Constitutional Union) – Wanted to Avoid the Issue of Slavery
John Bell, a former Whig and senator from Tennessee, represented the Constitutional Union Party, a coalition of former Whigs, moderate Democrats, and Southerners who wanted to avoid the issue of slavery altogether. Bell’s platform was simple: preserve the Union at all costs.
His party was made up of those who feared both Lincoln’s opposition to slavery’s expansion and Breckinridge’s aggressive pro-slavery stance. They sought to maintain the status quo and avoid conflict by focusing on upholding the Constitution and preserving the Union rather than addressing the slavery debate directly.
Bell had the strongest support in border states like Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia, where people were caught between the North and South and wanted to avoid war. However, his lack of a clear position on slavery made his campaign weak, as the nation was already too divided for neutrality to be an option.
The Role of Politics and Strategy
The Republican Party had only existed for a few years, but it had quickly gained prominence by absorbing former Whigs, Free Soilers, and anti-slavery Democrats who opposed the expansion of slavery. The Democratic Party, which had once been a dominant force in national politics, was now split in two. This division ultimately benefited Lincoln.
Lincoln and the Republicans focused on winning the North, where their anti-slavery platform had strong support. Meanwhile, Douglas and Breckinridge competed for the South, further dividing the Democratic vote. This allowed Lincoln to win a majority of electoral votes with only about 40% of the popular vote—one of the lowest percentages ever for a winning candidate.
Unlike Lincoln, Douglas campaigned nationwide, even visiting the South to urge moderation. However, his popular sovereignty stance pleased neither side—many Southerners saw him as weak on slavery, while many Northerners distrusted his compromises.
Breckinridge, on the other hand, was the clear favorite in the Deep South. His support for federal protections of slavery made him the true candidate of the Southern states, solidifying their commitment to secession if Lincoln won.
John Bell, despite avoiding the slavery debate, had a key role in the election. His Constitutional Union Party represented the last hope for compromise, but his moderate stance was not enough to stop the tide of division.
The Issue with Southern Ballots
Abraham Lincoln's name was not on the ballot in ten Southern states—Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas—due to the deep sectional divide over slavery and the rise of the Republican Party as an anti-slavery force. The Republican Party had virtually no presence in the South, where the political landscape was dominated by pro-slavery Democrats and Constitutional Unionists who opposed Lincoln’s platform of preventing slavery’s expansion into new territories. Many Southern states, fearing that a Lincoln presidency would lead to abolition and Northern domination of federal politics, actively worked to keep him off the ballot by either passing laws preventing Republican candidates from being listed or controlling local election processes to exclude him entirely. As a result, Lincoln won the presidency without receiving a single Southern electoral vote, further fueling Southern resentment and secessionist sentiment.
The Election That Changed America
The Election of 1860 was more than just a political contest—it was the breaking point for a deeply divided nation. The four-way split of the candidates highlighted the country’s fractures, and Lincoln’s victory, despite his moderate stance, confirmed the South’s worst fears.
Had the Democratic Party remained united, they might have stopped Lincoln’s election. But by splitting between Douglas and Breckinridge, they allowed the Republican Party to rise to power, forever altering American history.
In many ways, the election was the final proof that the United States could not remain both free and slave. What followed was four years of brutal war, the abolition of slavery, and the reshaping of the nation.
The election of 1860 was not just another vote—it was the last peaceful moment before America’s greatest conflict.
Nathaniel Reed’s First Election (November 6, 1860) (continued story)
Nathaniel Reed pulled his coat tighter around him as the wind whistled down the bustling streets of Springfield, Illinois. The autumn air was sharp, but he barely noticed the chill. Today was his first election, and he wasn’t about to let the cold keep him from casting his vote.
At nineteen, Nathaniel had never felt more like a man. He had spent the past few months listening intently at town meetings, reading the newspapers that arrived from Chicago, and debating with his father late into the night about what the country needed. The issue of slavery had divided the nation like never before, and though Illinois was a free state, tension simmered among its people.
Nathaniel walked quickly down the dirt road leading to the town hall, where men were already gathered. Some whispered in hushed tones, others argued openly, their voices carrying over the clatter of horses and carriages. The names on the ballot—Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglas, John Bell, and John Breckinridge—had sparked debates in every household.
As he approached the polling station, an older man in a stovepipe hat stood handing out pamphlets. "Young man, you know where you stand today?" he asked, offering him a leaflet with Lincoln’s name printed in bold letters.
Nathaniel nodded. "I do, sir."
He had heard Lincoln speak once in Springfield, standing atop a wooden platform, his voice rising over the crowd as he spoke of a house divided. "This nation cannot endure permanently half slave and half free," Lincoln had said. Those words had stayed with Nathaniel, and they echoed in his mind as he stepped into the hall.
Inside, the polling place smelled of sawdust and ink. Men lined up, some with their arms crossed, others shifting their weight as they waited for their turn. Nathaniel’s heart pounded as he reached the table where an official sat with a massive ledger.
"Name?" the man asked, dipping a quill into an inkwell.
"Nathaniel Reed."
The official nodded, checking the list before sliding a ballot forward. "Make your mark and drop it in the box."
Nathaniel took the paper with steady hands. He looked at the names before him, inhaled deeply, and carefully marked his choice.
Abraham Lincoln.
As he folded his ballot and placed it in the wooden box, a strange mix of pride and apprehension filled him. Would Lincoln win? Could a man so bold, so unwavering in his convictions, truly unite a divided nation?
Outside, the crowd had grown, some men shaking hands, others arguing about what the future might hold. Nathaniel lingered for a moment, listening, watching, feeling the weight of history pressing upon his shoulders. No matter what happened tonight, this was his country, his vote, his voice.
And he had used it.
November 7 – Waiting for the Results
The next morning, Nathaniel woke early and hurried to town, expecting to hear the final results. But the streets were quieter than he anticipated. Groups of men huddled around newspaper offices, waiting for new reports to arrive by telegraph.
"It will take days, maybe weeks, to know for certain," Mr. Jefferson, the town’s printer, muttered as he pressed fresh ink onto a broadsheet. "The South may not even accept the result, no matter what it is."
Nathaniel frowned. He hadn’t considered that. He had assumed that by morning, everyone would know who the next president was. Instead, he found himself in limbo, waiting, watching, and wondering what would come next.
Days passed, then a week. Newspapers trickled in from Chicago, New York, and Washington, each reporting on the slow process of counting the votes across the country. Illinois, of course, was strongly for Lincoln. But the South? They were furious.
"Some states are threatening to leave the Union already," Nathaniel overheard a man say at the town’s general store.
"Secede?" another asked. "They’d go to war over an election?"
Nathaniel bit his lip, uncertain. Could it really come to that?
November 20, 1860 – The Announcement in Springfield
It was a crisp autumn evening when the final news reached Springfield. Nathaniel had just finished work at his uncle’s shop when he heard a commotion in the streets. A group of men rushed past him, shouting and waving newspapers in the air.
"Lincoln has won!" someone cried. "It’s official! Lincoln is president-elect!"
Nathaniel sprinted toward the town square, where a crowd had already gathered outside the telegraph office. A man stood on the steps, holding up a telegram that had just arrived.
"Lincoln has won with one hundred and eighty electoral votes!" he shouted. "Douglas with twelve, Breckinridge seventy-two, and Bell thirty-nine!"
A roar of celebration burst through the crowd. Hats were thrown into the air, men clapped one another on the back, and cheers echoed down the streets. Nathaniel felt his breath hitch—he had been part of this, part of something greater than himself.
From a nearby balcony, a man unfurled a massive American flag, the fabric catching the evening breeze. Cheers erupted again.
"To Lincoln!" someone shouted, and the call was quickly taken up by dozens more.
But amid the joy, a few men stood silent, their faces dark with anger. Nathaniel recognized one of them—Mr. Higgins, a wealthy businessman who had spoken against Lincoln at a recent town meeting. His jaw was clenched, his arms crossed, and his lips pressed into a thin line.
"The South won’t stand for this," Nathaniel heard someone mutter nearby.
Nathaniel swallowed hard. He knew it was true—Lincoln’s election would not be the end of the nation's troubles, but the beginning of something even greater.
Still, as he looked around at the faces of men who believed, as he did, in the promise of a united country, he felt something stir inside him—hope.
Nathaniel lifted his chin, straightened his coat, and joined in the cheer.
"To Lincoln!"
The Day After the Election: America Reacts to Lincoln’s Victory
The morning of November 7, 1860, dawned with a sense of anticipation, tension, and relief across the United States. The previous day, citizens had cast their votes in what had been one of the most contentious elections in the nation’s history. Now, as newspapers rushed to print the results, telegraph wires buzzed with messages, and town criers spread the news, the country awoke to the reality that Abraham Lincoln had been elected as the 16th President of the United States.
For many, it was a moment of triumph. For others, it was a moment of fear. The election results made clear how deeply divided the nation had become—not just politically, but emotionally.
The Announcement: Lincoln Wins with a Northern Majority
By early morning, newspapers in Chicago, New York, and Washington D.C. printed bold headlines declaring Lincoln’s decisive victory. Across the North, in towns and cities where Republican support had been strong, crowds gathered in front of newspaper offices, reading aloud the results as they were posted on bulletin boards.
Lincoln had won with 180 electoral votes, securing victory against his divided opponents:
John C. Breckinridge (Southern Democrat) – 72 electoral votes
Stephen A. Douglas (Northern Democrat) – 12 electoral votes
John Bell (Constitutional Union) – 39 electoral votes
Despite only winning 40% of the popular vote, Lincoln had dominated in the North and the Western territories, securing every free state except New Jersey, which split its electoral votes.
In Springfield, Illinois, Lincoln’s hometown, church bells rang out in celebration. A torch-lit parade marched through the streets that night, and men toasted their victory in taverns and meeting halls. People gathered outside Lincoln’s home, eager for a word from the president-elect. But Lincoln, ever the reserved man, made no official speech, staying inside with his family, reflecting on the weight of what lay ahead.
Northern Jubilation: A Victory for the Republican Cause
In the North, the reaction was one of overwhelming celebration and optimism. The Republican Party had only existed for six years, yet it had managed to defeat the divided Democratic Party and take the White House. Many Republicans viewed Lincoln’s victory as a triumph for free labor and the preservation of the Union.
In Boston, New York City, and Philadelphia, fireworks lit up the night sky as people gathered in the streets, waving flags and singing patriotic songs. In Ohio and Pennsylvania, bands played as people flooded the town squares, shaking hands and offering congratulations. Republican newspapers proudly proclaimed, “The Union Has Spoken!” and “Freedom Prevails!”
Yet, there was also a sense of nervous excitement. Even among Lincoln’s supporters, many wondered: How would the South react? Would this be the moment the nation finally settled the question of slavery, or had they merely delayed an inevitable conflict?
Mixed Feelings in the Border States
While celebrations rang out in the North, the border states of Kentucky, Missouri, and Maryland experienced a more muted, divided response. These states still had slavery but had not yet embraced secessionist sentiment. Many in these regions had voted for John Bell of the Constitutional Union Party, hoping to preserve the Union without taking sides in the slavery debate.
In Louisville, Kentucky, small groups gathered to discuss the results in hushed tones, uncertain of what Lincoln’s presidency would mean for them. In Baltimore, Maryland, fights broke out in taverns between Republicans and pro-Southern Democrats, each arguing over the future of the country.
One newspaper in Missouri summed up the mood of the border states best:
"We are caught between two great storms—one of celebration and one of anger. Where shall we turn?"
Southern Shock and Outrage
In the Deep South, the reaction was immediate and visceral. Lincoln’s name had not even appeared on the ballot in ten Southern states, yet he had still won. To many Southerners, this was proof that the North had gained too much political power, and their voices no longer mattered in national politics.
In Charleston, South Carolina, the streets were filled—not with celebration, but with gatherings of angry men, discussing what this meant for their future. "This is the end of the Union as we know it," some declared.
Newspapers in Richmond, Virginia, and New Orleans, Louisiana, ran editorials calling Lincoln’s election a betrayal of the South, arguing that the North had used its superior population numbers to dominate Southern interests. In some cities, Republican newspapers were burned, and Unionist sympathizers were threatened.
However, no immediate calls for secession were made that day. Instead, Southern leaders met behind closed doors, discussing their next steps. Many believed they still had time to negotiate or find a way to prevent Lincoln from taking office in March. Others were already talking of drastic measures.
Lincoln’s Reaction: A Silent Night in Springfield
While the nation reacted with either joy or fury, Abraham Lincoln remained quiet. He spent the evening of November 7 inside his modest home, receiving visitors but making no public statements.
Lincoln knew that his election, though decisive, was not a landslide in the popular vote. He also knew that he had no direct power to act until his inauguration on March 4, 1861. For nearly four months, he would have to watch and wait as the nation reacted, with little control over what might happen next.
His close friend and political ally, David Davis, later recalled:
“Lincoln understood the gravity of his election. He was not a man to gloat or celebrate. He knew what was coming.”
Lincoln did, however, write letters to some of his closest supporters, thanking them for their efforts and expressing hope for unity. He believed that the Union could still hold together, but he also understood that many in the South saw his presidency as a threat to their way of life.
The Day After: A Nation in Uncertainty
November 7, 1860, was a day of celebration, anxiety, and deepening divisions. While the North rejoiced and Republican supporters saw Lincoln’s victory as a mandate for free labor and Union preservation, the South viewed it as a clear sign that their influence in national politics was slipping away.
The election had ended, but the consequences of Lincoln’s victory had only just begun. The future of the nation was uncertain, and in the days to come, conversations in both the North and South would determine whether the country could move forward peacefully or toward an inevitable conflict. For now, America stood on the edge of history, waiting for the next move.
South Carolina Secedes: The First Break from the Union
On December 20, 1860, South Carolina became the first state to secede from the United States, setting off a chain reaction that would lead to the formation of the Confederate States of America and, ultimately, the Civil War. The state’s leaders, convinced that Abraham Lincoln’s election threatened their way of life, moved swiftly to declare independence from the Union. Their decision was formalized in the Declaration of Secession, a document that laid out their grievances and justification for leaving the United States.
This bold act was the first official break in the Union, marking the beginning of a national crisis that would engulf the country in war within months.
The Road to Secession
Even before Lincoln’s election, South Carolina had been one of the most vocal states in favor of secession. The state had a long history of defiance toward federal authority, dating back to the Nullification Crisis of 1832, when South Carolina attempted to reject federal tariffs under the leadership of John C. Calhoun. Many Southern leaders believed that their states had voluntarily joined the Union and, therefore, had the right to leave it.
When Lincoln was elected on November 6, 1860, without winning a single Southern state, South Carolina’s leaders saw this as proof that the South no longer had a voice in the federal government. Fearing that Lincoln and the Republican Party would eventually abolish slavery, the state wasted no time in taking action.
On November 10, 1860, just four days after Lincoln’s victory, South Carolina’s legislature called for a special Secession Convention in Columbia. The meeting was later moved to Charleston due to an outbreak of smallpox in the state capital. There, state leaders debated and ultimately agreed on unanimous secession.
December 20, 1860: South Carolina Votes to Leave the Union
On December 20, 1860, South Carolina’s delegates unanimously voted (169-0) to secede from the United States, making it the first state to officially break away. That evening, a large crowd gathered in Charleston’s Institute Hall, where the official Ordinance of Secession was signed.
The room was filled with cheering citizens, waving Palmetto flags—South Carolina’s state symbol—while church bells rang throughout the city. Fireworks lit up the night sky as Charleston celebrated its independence from the Union.
The decision was met with jubilation in the South but shock and concern in the North. While some Southern states hesitated to act, South Carolina’s move pushed them closer to following suit.
The Declaration of Secession: A Justification for Leaving
On December 24, 1860, South Carolina issued its Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union. This document, modeled after the Declaration of Independence, outlined the state’s reasons for leaving.
Key Arguments in the Declaration:
The Federal Government Had Violated States’ Rights
South Carolina argued that when it joined the Union in 1788, it did so under the understanding that each state was sovereign.
The declaration claimed that the North had broken the original compact by refusing to enforce fugitive slave laws and interfering with slavery.
The North’s Opposition to Slavery Was Unacceptable
The document heavily focused on the issue of slavery, claiming that Northern states had consistently tried to undermine and restrict Southern slaveholding rights.
It pointed to Northern states’ refusal to return escaped enslaved people as a major violation of the Constitution.
Lincoln’s Election Was the Final Straw
Although Lincoln had promised not to interfere with slavery where it already existed, South Carolina saw his election as a direct threat.
The state believed that under a Republican-controlled government, slavery’s expansion—and ultimately its survival—would be in jeopardy.
Excerpt from South Carolina’s Declaration of Secession:
"A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. ... We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, do declare and ordain that the Union now subsisting between South Carolina and other States, under the name of ‘The United States of America,’ is hereby dissolved."
The declaration left no doubt: slavery was the primary cause of secession, and South Carolina’s leaders believed their way of life was under immediate threat.
National Reactions: A Country on Edge
In the South:
South Carolina’s secession was met with celebration across the Deep South.
Southern newspapers praised the state’s boldness, calling it an example for others to follow.
Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas soon began holding their own secession conventions.
In the North:
Many Northerners were stunned, but Lincoln and most Republicans still hoped the Union could be preserved.
Outgoing President James Buchanan declared secession illegal but claimed the federal government had no power to stop it.
Some called for compromise, but others felt the South had already made up its mind.
The First Step Toward War
South Carolina’s decision set the stage for the collapse of the Union. Within weeks, six more states followed, forming the Confederate States of America. However, at this point, there was still no war—only deep uncertainty.
Lincoln would not take office until March 4, 1861, meaning that for over two months, the nation was left without strong leadership. Would the remaining states find a way to bring South Carolina back, or would the break become permanent? While war was not yet inevitable, one thing was clear: the United States was no longer united.
The Secession of the Deep South: January–February 1861
The election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 sent shockwaves through the Southern states, particularly among those who viewed his presidency as a direct threat to their economic and social systems, which depended heavily on slavery. When South Carolina became the first state to secede on December 20, 1860, it signaled the beginning of a larger movement among Southern states to break away from the United States.
Between January and February 1861, six more states—Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas—followed South Carolina’s lead, officially passing ordinances of secession and declaring their departure from the Union. Each state justified its decision, citing the protection of slavery, states' rights, and their belief that the federal government was no longer serving their interests.
These secessions marked the rapid collapse of national unity and paved the way for the formal establishment of the Confederate States of America.
Mississippi Secedes – January 9, 1861
On January 9, 1861, Mississippi became the second state to secede from the Union. The state’s leaders were among the most vocal advocates for slavery’s expansion and had long warned that a Republican victory would mean the end of their way of life.
Mississippi’s Declaration of Secession made it clear that slavery was the primary reason for leaving the Union:
“Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery—the greatest material interest of the world. … A blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.”
With its economy deeply reliant on cotton production and enslaved labor, Mississippi’s leaders saw Lincoln’s election as the first step toward abolition and economic collapse.
The vote to secede passed overwhelmingly in Mississippi’s legislature, and secessionist leaders called for immediate unity with other Southern states to form a new government.
Florida Secedes – January 10, 1861
Florida was the third state to secede, passing its ordinance of secession on January 10, 1861. While it was one of the smallest Southern states in terms of population, its leaders viewed secession as necessary to preserve their way of life.
Florida’s secession convention mirrored those of South Carolina and Mississippi, citing states’ rights and slavery as the core reasons for leaving. Many Floridians were also concerned about the potential for Northern control over Southern trade and feared that Lincoln’s presidency would result in economic losses for plantation owners.
The final vote in Florida’s convention was 62 to 7 in favor of secession, showing strong support for breaking ties with the Union. Almost immediately, militias in the state seized federal forts and arsenals, preparing for potential conflict.
Alabama Secedes – January 11, 1861
On January 11, 1861, Alabama became the fourth state to secede. The state had long been a stronghold of pro-secession sentiment, and its leaders pushed for a unified Southern response to Lincoln’s election.
Alabama’s Declaration of Secession echoed those of its predecessors, stating that the federal government had become hostile to Southern interests and that continued membership in the Union would threaten slavery and states’ rights.
One of the most significant consequences of Alabama’s secession was its central role in forming the Confederate States of America. Just one month later, Montgomery, Alabama, was chosen as the first capital of the Confederacy, and Alabama played a crucial role in organizing the new government.
Georgia Secedes – January 19, 1861
Georgia’s decision to secede on January 19, 1861, was one of the most consequential moves in the early secession crisis. As the largest and most populous state in the Deep South, Georgia’s departure sent a clear message that the Southern rebellion was growing.
Georgia’s Declaration of Secession outlined its grievances against the Union, particularly the North’s growing hostility toward slavery:
“The party of Lincoln, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery, is now in control of the government. … The South must look to her own interests and protect her own institutions.”
The final vote was 208 to 89 in favor of secession. However, unlike some of the other Deep South states, Georgia had strong pro-Union voices, particularly in its mountainous northern region, where there were fewer plantations and fewer enslaved people. Despite these internal divisions, the majority of Georgia’s leadership fully embraced secession and called for military preparation.
Louisiana Secedes – January 26, 1861
On January 26, 1861, Louisiana became the sixth state to leave the Union. The state’s decision was largely influenced by its economic importance, particularly the port of New Orleans, which was a vital hub for Southern trade and the export of cotton and sugar.
Louisiana’s Declaration of Secession expressed concern over Northern interference in Southern commerce, arguing that continued membership in the Union would jeopardize their economy:
“The interests of Louisiana and her people demand that she should join her Southern sisters in dissolving a union that no longer respects our rights.”
New Orleans quickly became a key city for the Confederacy, and Louisiana leaders worked to secure forts, arsenals, and war supplies in preparation for the possibility of armed conflict.
Texas Secedes – February 1, 1861
Texas was the last of the original seven states to secede, passing its ordinance of secession on February 1, 1861. The decision was particularly significant because Texas had once been an independent republic before joining the United States in 1845.
Texas Governor Sam Houston, a Unionist and a former hero of the Texas Revolution, opposed secession and tried to prevent it. However, the secessionists won by a large majority, arguing that Texas had a right to leave the Union just as it had left Mexico decades earlier.
Texas’s Declaration of Secession was one of the strongest defenses of slavery:
“We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various states, and of the Confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity.”
After Texas officially seceded, Sam Houston refused to take an oath to the Confederacy and was removed from office. Texas then prepared for war, with many of its soldiers eventually joining Confederate armies in the Eastern battles.
The Path Toward War
By February 1861, seven states had seceded, and the Confederacy was beginning to take shape. In Montgomery, Alabama, Southern leaders met to draft a Confederate Constitution and elect their first president, Jefferson Davis. However, the Union still remained intact—Lincoln had not yet taken office, and the federal government had not made any direct moves to stop the seceding states.
While war had not yet begun, the events of early 1861 made it clear that the United States was no longer united. The next steps would determine whether the Union could be preserved through compromise or whether the nation was headed for an inevitable and bloody conflict.
The secession of Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas between January and February 1861 demonstrated how quickly the Southern states moved once South Carolina broke away. Each state justified its departure by citing slavery, states’ rights, and economic concerns, believing that Lincoln’s presidency posed a direct threat to their survival. These states would become the foundation of the Confederacy, and their decisions would lead directly to the beginning of the Civil War just months later.
The Formation of the Confederate States of America (February 1861)
In February 1861, just weeks after seven Southern states had declared their secession from the United States, their leaders moved quickly to establish a new nation. Representatives from these states gathered in Montgomery, Alabama, to form what they called the Confederate States of America (CSA). This meeting, known as the Montgomery Convention, laid the foundation for a separate Southern government, solidified the secession movement, and ensured that slavery would remain protected in their new constitution.
The creation of the CSA was a turning point in American history. No longer was the Union simply dealing with rebellious states—it now faced a new, organized government determined to separate permanently from the United States.
The Montgomery Convention: Building a New Government
On February 4, 1861, delegates from the seven seceded states—South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas—met in Montgomery, Alabama. Their goal was to draft a new constitution, establish a government, and elect leaders to guide the Confederacy.
Montgomery was chosen as the site for the meeting because it was centrally located within the seceded states and had strong pro-secession sentiment. At the time, the city became known as the "Cradle of the Confederacy."
From the beginning, the delegates focused on creating a government that would mirror the U.S. system but with key differences—most importantly, the explicit protection of slavery and greater emphasis on states’ rights.
The convention lasted less than two weeks, but in that short time, the Confederate States of America was officially formed.
Jefferson Davis: The First and Only President of the CSA
On February 9, 1861, the delegates unanimously elected Jefferson Davis of Mississippi as the provisional president of the Confederate States of America.
Davis was a former U.S. senator, Secretary of War, and Mexican-American War veteran. While he had initially argued for Southern states to remain in the Union, he ultimately embraced secession, believing it was necessary to preserve the South’s way of life.
Davis was considered a strong leader with military and political experience, making him an appealing choice for the Confederacy’s first president. Alongside him, Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia was elected vice president.
Davis’s First Speech as President
In his inaugural address on February 18, 1861, Davis made it clear that the Confederacy was not looking for war but would defend its sovereignty if necessary:
"The time for compromise has now passed. The South is prepared to maintain its position, and we will defend our liberties, our property, and our homes."
This statement set the tone for the Confederacy’s stance toward the United States—a willingness to fight if provoked but not actively seeking conflict. However, the South’s seizure of federal forts, arsenals, and supplies was already escalating tensions.
The Confederate Constitution: A Nation Built on Slavery and States' Rights
One of the first actions taken at the Montgomery Convention was the drafting of a new constitution for the Confederate States. Completed on March 11, 1861, the Confederate Constitution was similar to the U.S. Constitution but contained several key differences:
Explicit Protection of Slavery
The Confederate Constitution guaranteed that slavery would remain legal and protected by law in all Confederate states.
It also prohibited any future laws that could interfere with the ownership of enslaved people.
Unlike the U.S. Constitution, which had been vague about slavery, the Confederate version enshrined it as a permanent institution.
Stronger States' Rights
The new government gave more power to individual states, preventing the Confederate Congress from making sweeping federal laws unless approved by a large majority.
Each state had greater autonomy in managing its own affairs, including taxation and trade.
A Single Six-Year Presidential Term
Unlike the U.S. Constitution, which allowed presidents to serve four-year terms with the possibility of reelection, the Confederate president would serve one six-year term with no reelection.
This change was meant to prevent excessive federal control and avoid the rise of political dynasties.
No Tariffs on Southern Trade
The Confederacy banned protective tariffs, favoring free trade to strengthen its agricultural economy.
This decision was meant to encourage trade with European nations, particularly Britain and France, which relied on Southern cotton exports.
The Confederate Constitution ultimately reflected the South’s priorities: preserving slavery, limiting federal authority, and securing economic independence from the North.
Initial Reactions: Southern Confidence and Northern Uncertainty
Southern Celebrations
The formation of the Confederate States of America was met with celebration across the Deep South. Many Southerners believed they had successfully created a new, independent nation, free from Northern interference.
Newspapers throughout the South praised the new government, referring to it as the true defender of the Constitution. In cities like Charleston, New Orleans, and Richmond, parades were held, and Confederate flags were raised.
Northern Caution
In the North, the formation of the CSA was met with concern but not immediate action. Outgoing President James Buchanan took no military steps to stop the Confederacy, believing he had no authority to force states to stay in the Union.
Meanwhile, President-elect Abraham Lincoln had not yet taken office, and many in the North hoped that compromise was still possible before war broke out.
However, the fact that the South had formed a government, elected a president, and taken federal property made it clear that this was more than a temporary rebellion—it was an attempt to create a permanent, separate nation.
The Path to Conflict
The formation of the Confederate States of America in February 1861 was a pivotal moment in American history. The South had moved beyond threats of secession and established an entirely new government, complete with a president, a constitution, and its own political structure.
While Lincoln had not yet taken office, the events of February 1861 made it clear that reconciliation would be difficult, if not impossible. With both sides standing firm in their beliefs, the United States now stood on the brink of war.
The next step would come in April 1861, when tensions over federal forts in the South—particularly Fort Sumter in South Carolina—would ignite the first battle of the Civil War.
The Peace Conference of 1861: The Last Attempt to Save the Union
As the United States stood on the brink of civil war, desperate attempts were made to prevent conflict. One of the most notable of these efforts was the Peace Conference of 1861, held in Washington, D.C., from February 4 to February 27, 1861. Organized by Virginia and attended by representatives from 21 states, the conference sought to find a compromise between the North and the seceding Southern states.
However, despite weeks of debate and negotiation, the conference failed. The deep sectional divisions between free and slave states, as well as Republican opposition to any expansion of slavery, doomed the effort. By the time the conference ended, seven states had already seceded, and war was fast approaching.
The Background: A Nation in Crisis
With the Confederate States of America already forming, many politicians in border states and Northern states still loyal to the Union desperately sought a peaceful solution. They believed that secession might still be reversed if a compromise was reached before Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861.
Virginia, a key border state that had not yet seceded, proposed the Peace Conference as a last attempt to preserve the Union and avoid war.
The Peace Conference Begins: Hope for Reconciliation
On February 4, 1861, the same day that delegates from the seceded Southern states met in Montgomery, Alabama, to form the Confederacy, another group of 132 delegates from 21 states gathered in Washington, D.C.
The conference was attended primarily by representatives from free states and border states, but the Deep South was largely absent—the seceded states refused to send delegates, believing there was no hope for compromise.
Key Figures in the Peace Conference:
John Tyler (Virginia) – Former U.S. president, chairman of the conference, and a strong supporter of compromise.
James Guthrie (Kentucky) – Former Treasury Secretary and key negotiator.
William Seward (New York) – Lincoln’s soon-to-be Secretary of State, who opposed major concessions to the South.
Salmon P. Chase (Ohio) – A leading anti-slavery Republican who stood against any expansion of slavery.
The goal of the conference was to create a compromise proposal that could be passed by Congress and approved by both North and South before Lincoln’s inauguration.
The Proposed Compromise: A Last Attempt to Appease the South
After weeks of debate, the Peace Conference presented a plan similar to the Crittenden Compromise, which had already failed in Congress. The proposal included:
Extending the Missouri Compromise Line (36°30′) to the Pacific Ocean
Territories north of the line would be free.
Territories south of the line could have slavery, protected by federal law.
No Federal Interference with Slavery in Existing Slave States
Congress would be permanently barred from abolishing slavery in the South.
Strict Enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law
Northern states would be required to return escaped enslaved people to the South.
Compensation for Owners of Escaped Slaves
If a fugitive enslaved person could not be returned, their owner would be financially compensated.
A Constitutional Amendment to Make These Provisions Permanent
The compromise would have been added to the U.S. Constitution, preventing future Congresses from overturning it.
The central idea of the plan was to reassure the South that slavery would be permanently protected, even as new territories were added to the Union.
The Conference Fails: Deep Sectional Divisions
Despite weeks of negotiation, the Republican-controlled Congress rejected the compromise. The main reason for its failure was the growing belief among Republicans that any further expansion of slavery was unacceptable.
Key Reasons for the Failure:
Republicans Refused to Allow Slavery to Expand
Lincoln and the Republican Party had been elected on a platform that opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories.
Any proposal allowing slavery’s expansion—even with a compromise—would contradict Republican principles.
Republican leaders in Congress refused to support it, making passage impossible.
Southern States Had Already Decided on Secession
By February 1861, seven states had already seceded, and they refused to recognize any proposal that kept them in the Union.
Confederate leaders believed war was inevitable and did not trust the North’s attempts at compromise.
Lincoln Did Not Support the Compromise
Although Lincoln was not yet president, he had already made it clear that he opposed any expansion of slavery.
He privately urged Republican congressmen to reject the Peace Conference’s proposal.
The Deep South Was Not Represented
The conference only included Union-loyal and undecided states, meaning that the most radical secessionists were not even at the table.
Without Southern participation, any deal made would likely have no real effect on reversing secession.
The Aftermath: No More Room for Compromise
On February 27, 1861, the Peace Conference’s proposal was sent to Congress, but it was quickly rejected by the Republican-controlled Senate. Without the support of Lincoln or the Republican Party, the proposal had no chance of passing. This failure marked the end of any realistic attempts to prevent war through negotiation.
What Happened Next?
March 4, 1861 – Lincoln was inaugurated, giving his famous speech in which he said: “We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies.”
April 12, 1861 – Just six weeks after the Peace Conference failed, the Confederacy fired on Fort Sumter, beginning the Civil War.
A Last Attempt That Came Too Late
The Peace Conference of 1861 was the final effort to avoid war, but by the time it was held, the divide between North and South was too great. The Republicans refused to expand slavery, and the South was already preparing for war.
The failure of this compromise proved that negotiation was no longer an option. With the Union unwilling to accept slavery’s expansion and the Confederacy unwilling to remain in a country where slavery might be threatened, conflict was inevitable.
Just weeks later, the first shots of the Civil War were fired, and the nation descended into four years of brutal fighting.
Lincoln’s Inauguration Delay, His Response, and the Final Attempts at Compromise
As Abraham Lincoln won the presidency in November 1860, the nation was already unraveling. South Carolina seceded on December 20, 1860, followed by six more states by February 1861. A new government—the Confederate States of America (CSA)—had already formed in Montgomery, Alabama, and Jefferson Davis had been inaugurated as its president.
Yet, Lincoln remained a president-elect, unable to act until March 4, 1861, due to the long transition period between election and inauguration. During these crucial four months, the United States was without effective leadership, as outgoing President James Buchanan refused to take action against the seceding states.
As the nation teetered on the brink of war, last-minute efforts at compromise were attempted, but none succeeded. The most notable was the Crittenden Compromise, which sought to protect slavery permanently to prevent secession. However, Lincoln and the Republicans rejected it, believing it went against their core principles.
By the time Lincoln finally took office, the Union was in crisis, and the hope of a peaceful resolution was rapidly fading.
Buchanan’s Inaction: A Lame-Duck Presidency
James Buchanan, the 15th President of the United States (1857–1861), was widely criticized for his inaction during the secession crisis. Although he personally opposed secession, he believed the federal government had no constitutional authority to force states to stay in the Union.
In his final address to Congress in December 1860, Buchanan condemned the Southern states for seceding but also blamed Northern abolitionists for escalating tensions. He insisted that while secession was illegal, there was nothing he could do to stop it. This stance effectively gave the South a free pass to continue leaving the Union without federal intervention.
Meanwhile, Southern militias began seizing federal forts, arsenals, and naval yards, yet Buchanan still did not act. His failure to respond allowed the Confederacy to strengthen its position before Lincoln even took office.
The Crittenden Compromise: The Last Hope for Avoiding War
As tensions mounted, Kentucky Senator John J. Crittenden proposed a final effort to keep the Union together. His plan, known as the Crittenden Compromise, was introduced in December 1860 and debated into January 1861.
Key Provisions of the Crittenden Compromise:
Extend the Missouri Compromise Line (36°30′) Permanently
Slavery would be prohibited north of this line but protected south of it, including future territories.
Prohibit Congress from Interfering with Slavery in the South
The federal government could never abolish slavery in states where it already existed.
Protect Slavery in Washington, D.C.
Slavery in the nation's capital would be protected unless Maryland and Virginia agreed to abolish it.
Ban Federal Interference with the Interstate Slave Trade
Slaveholders could freely transport enslaved people between states without federal interference.
Make These Provisions Unamendable
The amendments would be permanent, meaning future Congresses could never repeal them.
Crittenden’s goal was to reassure the South that slavery would always be protected, giving them no reason to secede. However, Lincoln and the Republicans rejected the proposal.
Lincoln’s Firm Stance Against Compromise
Lincoln, even before taking office, made it clear that he would not support any compromise that allowed the expansion of slavery. While he did not intend to abolish slavery where it already existed, he firmly opposed any new concessions to the South.
Lincoln personally wrote to Republican lawmakers in December 1860, instructing them not to support the Crittenden Compromise because:
It went against the Republican platform, which was founded on stopping the expansion of slavery.
It would legitimize the spread of slavery into new territories, undoing decades of anti-slavery efforts.
It would reward Southern states for seceding, setting a dangerous precedent.
Many Northern leaders believed that compromise would only delay the inevitable conflict, rather than resolve the core issue dividing the country.
In the end, the Crittenden Compromise failed, as Republicans in Congress refused to support it, and secession continued.
Lincoln’s Inauguration: A President Taking Office in Crisis
By the time Lincoln finally took the oath of office on March 4, 1861, the United States was already divided. Seven states had seceded, the Confederacy had been formed, and federal property in the South was being taken by force.
Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address (March 4, 1861)
Lincoln’s first major challenge as president was to address the nation’s deepening crisis. With the Union breaking apart and the Confederacy asserting its independence, his inaugural speech was carefully crafted to reassure the South while firmly upholding the Union.
Lincoln’s Key Messages in His First Inaugural Address
He Pledged Not to Interfere with Slavery Where It Already Existed
Lincoln repeatedly stated that he had no intention of abolishing slavery in Southern states.
He directly addressed Southerners, saying:
“I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists.”
He emphasized that his goal was to preserve the Union, not to end slavery.
He Declared Secession Illegal and Insisted the Union Was Perpetual
Lincoln argued that the United States was a permanent entity and that no state had the right to leave.
He stated:
“No State, upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the Union.”
He claimed that secession was not only unconstitutional but also unnecessary, since Southern rights were still protected under the law.
He Urged Reconciliation but Issued a Warning
Lincoln appealed to Southern leaders, urging them to reconsider their decision and return to the Union peacefully.
He famously declared:
“We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies.”
However, he also made it clear that he would not allow the Union to be dismantled, warning that any attack on U.S. property would be met with force.
While Lincoln’s address sought to calm tensions, many in the South saw it as confirmation that the Union would not recognize Confederate independence, making war more likely.
Most Famous Line from Lincoln’s Speech:
“The government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection.”
Despite Lincoln’s appeal for unity, the South was already preparing for war. Confederate forces had surrounded Fort Sumter in South Carolina, demanding its surrender.
The End of Compromise and the Road to War
By March 1861, it was clear that all attempts at compromise had failed. The Crittenden Compromise was dead, Buchanan had left office without action, and Lincoln was now faced with a divided country on the brink of war.
Key Takeaways from the Inauguration Period:
Lincoln was forced to wait four months before taking office, allowing the South to strengthen its position.
Buchanan did nothing to stop secession, claiming the federal government had no authority to intervene.
The last major attempt at compromise (Crittenden Compromise) failed, as Republicans refused to extend slavery.
Lincoln took office with a firm but calm approach, hoping to avoid war but unwilling to recognize secession.
The Role of Border States and Unionist Resistance
As the United States fractured in early 1861, seven Southern states seceded to form the Confederate States of America (CSA). However, not all slave-holding states immediately joined the Confederacy. Several key border states—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, Missouri, Kentucky, and Maryland—remained in the Union, at least for the time being. These states found themselves torn between North and South, with both sides vying for their allegiance.
At the same time, Unionist resistance within the South itself further complicated secession. Not all Southerners supported the Confederacy, and many regions, particularly in western Virginia and eastern Tennessee, actively opposed leaving the Union. This internal division within Southern states created civil strife that would shape the course of the war.
Why Some Slave States Didn’t Secede (Yet)
While the Deep South had quickly seceded following Lincoln’s election, several Upper South and border states hesitated. Despite being slave states, these regions had economic and political divisions that kept them from immediately joining the Confederacy.
1. Economic Ties to the North
Many border states had strong economic connections with Northern markets. Unlike the Deep South, which was almost entirely reliant on cotton plantations and slavery, the border states had diverse economies that included:
Industrial centers (Virginia, Maryland, and Missouri)
Smaller-scale farming that did not rely as heavily on slavery (Kentucky and Tennessee)
Extensive railroad networks that connected them to the North
Breaking away from the Union threatened their economic stability, making secession a much harder decision.
2. Political Divisions Over Secession
Many leaders in these states did not initially support secession.
Kentucky and Missouri declared neutrality, hoping to avoid choosing sides.
Maryland had strong Confederate sympathies, but its proximity to Washington, D.C., made secession dangerous.
Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Arkansas debated secession but had strong pro-Union factions.
These divisions meant that while many leaders sympathized with the South, they were hesitant to commit to a war.
3. The Impact of Lincoln’s Actions
Abraham Lincoln understood the importance of keeping border states in the Union. He carefully avoided taking actions that might push them toward the Confederacy, including:
Denying that he intended to abolish slavery where it already existed.
Reassuring border states that the war was about preserving the Union, not ending slavery.
Using federal troops to maintain control in key areas (especially in Maryland and Missouri).
Despite these efforts, the border states remained politically unstable, with pro-Union and pro-Confederate factions fighting for control.
Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina: States on the Edge
These four states remained in the Union as of April 1861, but their loyalty was fragile.
Virginia was deeply divided—while eastern Virginia supported secession, western Virginia was pro-Union and would eventually break away to form West Virginia.
Tennessee and North Carolina had strong pro-Union regions, particularly in the Appalachian Mountains.
Arkansas was hesitant to secede due to its economic ties to the Mississippi River trade.
However, these states ultimately joined the Confederacy after Lincoln called for troops following the attack on Fort Sumter in April 1861.
Missouri, Kentucky, and Maryland: Divided States
These three states never officially joined the Confederacy, but they were deeply divided and saw significant internal conflict.
1. Missouri: A State at War with Itself
Missouri had both a pro-Confederate government and a pro-Union government, leading to an internal civil war.
Union forces arrested pro-Confederate officials and took control of the state.
Guerrilla warfare raged for years, with pro-Confederate fighters like William Quantrill’s Raiders attacking Union forces.
2. Kentucky: Officially Neutral but Internally Divided
Kentucky declared neutrality at the beginning of the war, refusing to join either side.
Both Union and Confederate forces tried to win Kentucky’s loyalty because of its strategic location.
In 1862, the Confederate army occupied parts of Kentucky, but after the Battle of Perryville, the state remained under Union control.
3. Maryland: Lincoln Takes Drastic Measures
Maryland was critical because of its location—if it seceded, Washington, D.C., would be surrounded by Confederate states.
Many Marylanders supported the South, leading to riots in Baltimore.
Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and arrested pro-Confederate lawmakers, ensuring the state stayed in the Union.
These states were not fully Confederate, but they were not fully Unionist either, making them some of the most contested areas of the war.
Unionist Movements in the South
Despite the South’s secession, not all Southerners supported the Confederacy. Many people in certain regions actively resisted secession, causing internal divisions within the Southern states.
1. Western Virginia: The Birth of West Virginia
The mountainous western part of Virginia opposed secession, as its economy did not depend on slavery.
When Virginia joined the Confederacy, western Virginians refused to follow.
They formed a pro-Union government, and in 1863, West Virginia became its own state, remaining in the Union.
2. Eastern Tennessee: Strong Unionist Sentiment
Eastern Tennessee was home to many small farmers who had little connection to the plantation economy.
Most people in the region opposed secession and some even attempted to form a separate pro-Union state like West Virginia.
The Confederacy responded harshly, arresting and persecuting pro-Union activists.
3. North Carolina’s Hidden Resistance
While North Carolina ultimately joined the Confederacy, Unionist sentiment remained strong in the Appalachian region.
Many North Carolinians refused to fight for the Confederacy, and some even joined Union regiments.
These internal conflicts weakened the Confederacy from within, as it faced not only Northern opposition but also resistance from its own people.
A Divided South, A Fractured Nation
The role of border states and Southern Unionists was crucial in shaping the early months of the Civil War. While some slave states remained in the Union, their loyalty was fragile, and their populations were deeply divided.
At the same time, not all Southerners supported secession, leading to resistance movements within the Confederacy itself. The presence of pro-Union regions in the South meant that the Civil War was not just a conflict between North and South—it was also a war within the South itself.
As the war progressed, these divided loyalties would continue to shape military strategies, political struggles, and the ultimate fate of the Union and the Confederacy.
Comments